|

John
and Marsha Friede in their yard standing next to an enormous New Guinea
Highlands Telefomin house door board
TM: I
know that expanding public awareness of New Guinea Art is important to
you. How close do you feel you are to transforming the art worlds
perception of the art? Do you feel the old bias is slowly
vanishing with your exhibition at the de Young Museum, and the publication of
the Jolika Collection?
I don't think there was a bias
against New Guinea art, I think people were just ignorant about it.
There
was a certain bias, because this is the quality I like best about it,
it works for some people the other way. The New Guinea people were
isolated from the rest of mankind for almost 50,000 years.
They migrated from
Africa, they and the aboriginals were the same group of people, and maybe little
groups spun off on the way and became the Naga, the Hill Tribes of Southern India.
There's a possible argument that even the Ainu are part of that movement.
The
genetic work hasn't been done yet and we don't know.
We do know that the New
Guinea people arrived first in Australia, not in New Guinea. They walked to
New Guinea, the Torres Islands were a plain,
more or less the way the
Siberian plain occurred 40,000 years later. There
were ice ages back 50,000
years ago and they just walked there. But when
they arrived, it was very
different from Australia, and then the ocean rose and they were alone.
It was a
jungle, Australia is a desert. The art, the
culture evolved from that, but
it did not evolve with the rest of the world.
When you collect say the art
of Africa, you're talking about an art which
was part of the world. That
doesn't mean that the King of Zaire in the year 1500 was
familiar with Paris, but he
had familiarity with modern technologies, with
iron, with metal. Perhaps with
Arab slavers that had been there at least
1000 AD, there before there
were even Muslims and all the integration into
the world, so they were
somewhat familiar. Our stuff is very unfamiliar. Also they are acknowledged
cannibals. We probably all were cannibals, but some of us are a little
unwilling to admit that.
In New Guinea it's part of the right of initiation as it
is in most of the places where it exists. Also it's strong, my mother had
some beautiful African pieces among impressionist paintings.
If you
put some of my New Guinea pieces in the house
the way Bill Rubin did in his
primitivism show at The Museum of Modern Art they would
eat the apartment. They are
so much more powerful. They would make the
people accustomed to the more
gentle and civilized styles very uncomfortable.

Plate 267.
Male Figure, Yimam, Middle Sepik, Upper Karawari River, 36 inches
I have always been a
propagandist in the same way the young lover proclaims
to the world how wonderful his
girl or boy is, I proclaim to the world how
wonderful this art is, and I
have been fortunate enough to have found a
partner in the museum who
feels the same way. Very few museums would have
given the scale of gallery
that we had, installing it all themselves, without
asking me to pay one cent for
it with the best fiber optic lighting, and
display cases I have seen in
any museum.
By some miracle of good fortune we
were able to hire Christina
Hellmich who had been the Oceanic curator
at Salem, Peabody Essex at
Salem Mass. and has now become the curator of the Jolika Collection and
Oceanic Art in general at the de Young. She
is a fountain of ideas, a geyser of ideas. She has been very much
involved, as I have been with the political side of
New Guinea. The ambassador to
the US and Canada, a young man named Evan
Paki who is in his
30's, but of course with an advanced law
degree, is one of the most
educated people in New Guinea. He was enough of
a decent citizen to turn down
the partnerships that he had somewhere in
Australia, to become the
ambassador for what has to be a very low salary. He
is tremendously enthusiastic
and has said what we have done essentially is
opened a PNG showroom in San
Francisco.
It's a nice place for it.
It is! The San Francisco people
are remarkably open-minded.
I come from the east coast, and the east
coast is much more Eurocentric.
The Boston museum didn't have any tribal
art until recently, and they
have a small collection from a nice man named
Bill Teel & his wife.
The Metropolitan took the primitive art museum because
Nelson Rockefeller was Nelson
Rockefeller and said "you
will take this collection". They always hated it,
although now they are starting
to realize it is not to be hated and it can be a
draw, but they still have not
really capitalized on it. It's the kind of stepchild
that I would never want my
collection to be.
We have, as I mentioned from
Christina, many
programs. We
try to include the contemporary art of New
Guinea in the programs but not in
the collection. About the artists from New
Guinea, we just had a show and a demonstration and performances with some
people at the very end of April, in San Francisco and a
big crowd came. Ninety Percent of
those people two years ago wouldn't have known where New Guinea
is.
In fact
my favorite funny quote from Evan Paki was "I'm
glad you are doing this,
because I get so tired of answering the question is
New Guinea part of
Africa?"
 Plate
138. Figure for a Sacred Flute, Wusear, Lower Sepik, Yuat River,
Biwat People, Wood, Cassowary Feathers, Boar Tusk, Human Hair &
Molars..., 17 5/8"
TM: What are
your plans for the future?
My plans for the collection
for the future is that every good thing will go
into the de Young. I don't say
everything, because there will always be
pieces that are weeded out.
The de Young has a limit as to what it can show, and
if I have a great one and a
not so great one, it is better to return the not
so great one to the market and
maybe pay a quarter of the price toward
something else. But that's
immaterial, the collection will go there. I
hope I am successful enough in
my venture capital investing to provide
endowment, so that the program
side will continue to be very active.
In terms of publications we
did the first book which was intended to be an overwhelmingly impressive
book. I felt I had to make the point, this is a great place, this stuff is
fabulous. That book was a generic book that covered the whole area of the
collection. It will be followed, assuming I continue to walk the earth,
with seven to nine more books, which will be regional books.
The first two
books are pretty far along in preparation, and relate to the next rotation of
material that will take place at the de Young.
In 2009 the present exhibition
will come down, a few super New Guinea pieces
from all over the place will
remain up, as an illustration of the cultures
of the island. Then a large
exhibition of highlands and Massim material will
go up. We are currently doing a
Highlands book and a Massim book. They will both be
approx 500 pages, with approx
350 color plates with good serious essays by
scholars. That will be followed by other books, I haven't figured out the
order, and of course New
Guinea is a place where everybody influences
everybody so whatever
arbitrary line you put on the map, you're wrong.

Plate 502.
Ceremonial Mask, Buk, Torres Straits, Turtle Shell, Wood,
Cassowary Feathers, Shell, Seed, Natural Pigments, 31.5 inches
The Sepik is too big for one book, we'll
have to break up Sepik into two groups. I
want to do a book on the Ramu
River,
no one has ever done a a book on the Ramu. I want to do a book on Astrolabe
Bay, Huon Gulf, and Collingwood Bay. Also a book on the Northwest
Coast (Lake Sentani, Geelvink Bay) and if I can fit it in, we may
include the west and south coasts of West Papua (Asmat, Digul and
Marind-Anim). The one
book that I think is going to be an extraordinary revelation is the PNG south
coast. We will start with Moresby and Motu going all the way to the
Torres Straits. Obviously we have Australia in there but I don't care about politics.
That will include the classic Papuan Gulf material, the Gogodala
material, the Fly River
material and Torres material. Theoretically it has a title like “The
Masters of
Surrealism”, and there’s nothing except some of the
Baining tapa masks of New
Britain, which are actually part of the same ancient culture, there’s
nothing to touch that stuff for complete wild madness.
Of course it’s
not madness, its man’s incredible imagination. We all have
it, but there it
ran free. I think that’s a great thing.
If the world looks at this as the art
of some strange, perhaps smelly foreigners, they are missing the point.
This is one of the primal art image sources in the world.
Take the ancient Alaskan cultures that
were on the edge of the glaciers as
opposed to the deep jungle. The terrain was different, so the hunting was different, but the magic was the same.
A lot of
the objects were the same. The spear thrower weights were
made of mammoth ivory not
bamboo or shell, but they had the same function. They did more painting than
they did carving, because they didn’t have much in the way of wood.
The
glaciers hadn’t left them any great forests. Unlike the glaciers, you could go
there in my life time, and take pictures of them. The entire culture is on
film and that’s amazing.

Plate 452.
Female Figure, Imunu, Gulf Province, Iwaino People, 24
1/8"
TM: Will you
continue to expand your collection?
Yes I will continue to expand
the collection, assuming that I can honor my
responsibilities to the
children. We called it the Jolika Collection,
because that’s an acronym
for the children, JO--Johnny, LI--Lisa, and --KA
for Karen. The collection’s
very valuable, but children of wealthy people
are greedy little bastards,
and would have been very upset that Daddy is giving away all that money.
They wouldn’t think of it as art, they just think
of it as money.
My kids took the opposite point of view, they would have
liked to keep a few things,
but they understand that you can’t give away Mount
Fuji and just keep the white
part on top. Then you don’t have Mt. Fuji. So
you have to do the thing
right, or not do it at all. They also understand
that there’s a physical,
financial and psychological burden in having a huge
house full of stuff. Kids
today would like to be free of that, and it’s nice
the museum is providing that
space. One of our children is a doctor in San
Francisco, and her kids are
right there. One of our other children is a
resident of Seattle and while
that is not right there, it’s close. Our son
is in New Hampshire, so
he’ll have to take a plane to visit his sisters out
in California. After it gets
really cold in New Hampshire, he may want to do
that from time to time. We
just built a house in Berkeley California right next to our
daughter’s house, which is
fun, and it’s a place for all the kids to stay.
In terms of
targeting what we’re going to be buying now, it’s clear over the last year or two, as
I become more aware of the space limitations in
California I have tried to
eliminate the middle ground to the extent that I can. This is a problem for us.
Douglas
Newton and I used to talk about this. We like everything from New Guinea, we
may not like the whole statue but we like the nose, the elegant way the feet
are, you know you can go one forever. But you can’t collect forever,
because these things just stack up.

Plate 270.
Female Figure, Aripa, Middle Sepik, Upper Karawari River, Ewa
People, 42 inches
So I am basically buying
things in the higher price
category, those things that absolutely demand to be in
the collection. Sometimes they
force something else out, if they aren’t
part of a group. If nothing
else looks like that; it’s even more interesting
in a way. I try not to ever buy seconds.
There are certain types of things we don’t have at all.
This is not because we
don’t like them, but because we have never seen one as good as the one I would
like to have. It’s not a stamp collection, so we don’t need to have all
the colors of the 14 cent inverted airplane stamp.
If a piece isn’t up
to par, it cheapens the collection. Another thing collectors have to be careful
of is that you don’t want to buy one that looks just like the one in a
book. It may look more like the one in the book than you would like.
They guy
who made it may have had the book.
The other kinds of things that
we are buying, that I think adds a tremendous amount of value to the books
we are publishing and to the collection, are the absolutely minor things.
The everyday objects.
Everything
in New Guinea has some symbolic or ritual meaning, even a
pounder, that has a face on
it, to make it more effective as a pounder. You
can clutter up the world with
those things, but if you are very careful, you
can get wonderful things.
You
get 3 or 4 of those, and the major figure, and
you'll get a better understanding
of the culture, than if you just had that
major figure. Even the
minor pieces can be hard
to find, but they are still buyable, so all you
reading this should buy them
too. I’m not pushing the prices up on those
because they are so low
already and I
like to leave them there.

Plate 85.
Headrest, Lower Sepik, Wood, Bamboo, Shell, Fiber, 18 3/8 inches
TM: What do you see
in the future for New Guinea Art?
Well New Guinea was a place with a
small population of three million people maybe
less. There aren’t very many
pieces. Now you think there are; I was in
Berlin looking at the store
rooms, they have a lot of pieces. But how many
really wonderful things are
there 2000, 5,000, 10,000? We read that the Field Collection
in Chicago they collected
80,000 objects, I‘m sure it is a lot of relatively
undecorated sticks among them.
I don’t think there are 80,000 wonderful New Guinea objects in the world. That
includes the little ones. They’re all getting
bought. At some point, sooner
rather than later, New Guinea art is going to be more like
Romanesque Art, than it is
like African or contemporary art. Every year you
have more contemporary art.
You’ll be able to buy a piece, I can go out
today and buy a Romanesque
Capitol, but you want to buy a Romanesque
collection? Forget it. If you
get 5 pieces in 5 years you’re lucky. It’s not
that expensive either. When you have
no pieces, you have no dealers and no collectors. If anything the prices go
down.
In the case of
New Guinea Art there’s enough pieces that I don’t think the prices
will go down. I don’t care.
When I buy a piece, the next click on the value chart is
zero.
I’m giving it
away, and I can’t even deduct this stuff because it’s worth so much
more than what I will ever earn in my life. The tax consequences of the gift are
also zero. When you leave things in your will to a museum, you
have no tax
consequences. A lot of pieces will be left in our will, because we want to live with
them as long as possible.
As you said when you walked in the house
if you
have 30,000 spirits you're liable to live a long time, maybe two of them are
actually pretty good for longevity! There might be one trying to kill you, but I
like to think the majority are
on our side (laughter). This is great fun this
collecting, it’s changed our lives.
 Plate
329. Ceremonial Carving, Yina, Washkuk Hills, Kwoma People, 28 5/8"
Link
to de Young Museum and the Jolika Collection
Tribalmania
extends its sincere gratitude and appreciation to John Friede for offering
his time and insightful views!
|
|